State v. Holtsclaw
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, Judge.
Case Summary
The State of Indiana appeals the denial of its motion to correct error following the trial court’s order granting defendant Elvis Holtsclaw’s (“Holtsclaw”) motion to suppress evidence. The parties raise two issues for our review, one of which we find dispositive: whether the State’s appeal should be dismissed as untimely. We dismiss.
Facts and Procedural History
On April 13, 2010, after an investigation that included two chemical tests, the State charged Holtsclaw with Operating a Motor Vehicle While Intoxicated Causing Serious Bodily Injury, as a Class D…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- N.D.F. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SierpIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. GradisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. SniderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Indiana v. Elvis HoltsclawIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. HoltsclawIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012