Legal Opinion

State v. Holtsclaw

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 2012No. 49A02-1108-CR-743PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

The State of Indiana appeals the denial of its motion to correct error following the trial court’s order granting defendant Elvis Holtsclaw’s (“Holtsclaw”) motion to suppress evidence. The parties raise two issues for our review, one of which we find dispositive: whether the State’s appeal should be dismissed as untimely. We dismiss.

Facts and Procedural History

On April 13, 2010, after an investigation that included two chemical tests, the State charged Holtsclaw with Operating a Motor Vehicle While Intoxicated Causing Serious Bodily Injury, as a Class D…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. N.D.F. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. SierpIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. State v. GradisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. State v. SniderIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Indiana v. Elvis HoltsclawIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. HoltsclawIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API