Merrell v. State

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant was convicted of “the offense of habitual violator” anc the offense of driving under the influence (of alcohol). Via thref enumerations of error, he asserts the general grounds and the impro priety of an evidentiary ruling. Held:

Decided June 22, 1989. Roger E. Bradley, for appellant. Roger G. Queen, District Attorney, for appellee.

1. In his first and second enumerations of error, defendant contends the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict. In this regard, he contends the State failed to prove that he operated a motor vehicle at all since…