Illinois Cent. R. v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
1ConcurrenceNields, District Judge
I concur in the result reached by Judge THOMPSON that section 3 (e) of the amendment to the Inland Waterways Corporation Act, known as the Denison Act (49 USCA § 153(e), violates the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and, consequently, that the second supplemental order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, here complained of, is void.
In. my opinion, the deprivation of property that plaintiffs will suffer is not “short-hauling” over their all-raff routes. That loss might well be the result of wholesome water competition. But the second supplemental order of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. McLaughlinDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1932