Legal Opinion

Vincent Systems GMBH v. Fillauer Companies, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided June 24, 2025No. 1:23-cv-00002Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA VINCENT SYSTEMS GMBH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 1:23-cv-2 v. ) ) Judge Atchley FILLAUER COMPANIES, INC. & ) MOTION CONTROL, INC., ) Magistrate Judge Dumitru ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Every patent infringement case includes a claim construction phase. Claim construction “is the judicial statement of what is and is not covered by the technical terms and other words of the claims.” Netword, LLC v. Centraal Corp.,

242 F.3d 1347, 1352

(Fed. Cir. 2001). Consistent with its obligation under Markman v.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API