Legal Opinion

Brown v. Guillot

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 3, 1919No. 23809PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application for writs of mandamus and prohibition by Treville Guillot against the District Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

This proceeding is in many respects like the case of Howell et al. v. Mundy, In re Fakier et al., applying for Writ of Mandamus, 145 La. 291, 82 South. 274.

Relator, who is defendant in a suit pending in the district court, asks that the judge be directed to recognize and respect his right to have his attorney in fact, Charles J. Mundy, who is authorized by a written power of attorney, to represent him, and to plead and defend the suit. The district judge refuses to receive or consider a petition or prayer for a trial by jury and for the fixing of the amount of bond to be furnished by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Howell v. MundySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adamietz v. PontiffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API