Legal Opinion

People v. Glantz

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1983No. Docket 58049Published

1Opinion of the CourtM. J. Kelly, J.

Defendant was convicted by a jury in district court of operating a motor vehicle while his license was suspended, in violation of Oak Park Ordinance §40-20. Defendant was sentenced to a term of three days in jail and a $100 fine. Defendant appealed to the Oakland County Circuit Court, which affirmed. Defendant appeals to this Court by leave granted.

Defendant’s first argument is a collateral attack on the validity of the suspension of his license. He argues that no evidence was introduced at trial that the court which authorized suspension of his license and the Secretary of State complied…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. FredSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Cummins v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. State v. RoyConnecticut Superior Court · 1961
  4. State v. HarknessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  5. State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API