Legal Opinion
THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C. v. HARTLEIB
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 31, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02728Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE WEISER LAW FIRM, P.C., et al., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiffs, NO. 2:19-cv-02728-KSM v. MICHAEL HARTLEIB, Defendant. MEMORANDUM MARSTON, J. March 31, 2022 This case spawns from a years long dispute between Plaintiffs, the Weiser Law Firm, P.C. (the “Law Firm”) and Robert Weiser, Esquire, and Defendant Michael Hartleib. Plaintiffs claim that Hartleib has embarked on a campaign to disparage them to judges, members of the legal community, and current and prospective clients. (See Doc. No. 69.) Plaintiffs assert claims for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.