Legal Opinion

Sterling v. Fusilier

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 15, 1820PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the court of the third district.

1Opinion of the CourtMathews, J.

This case is submitted to us, without aiW argument on the part of the appellee, aPPe^ant having failed to appear on the day appointed for its hearing. J r £ «

The action is against the warrantor of the © title to a slave, describéd in the plaintiff’s peti-r 1 tion, whom he bought from Martin L. Hannie, ’ ⅛ who sold as sole owner, and warranted the title. The answer of the defendant denies any right of action, as set forth by the plaintiff, and also all the allegations in the petition.

The facts agreed upon by the parties, and the evidence spread on the record, fully establish all the material…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Strawbridge v. WarfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  2. Babineau v. CormierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1823
  3. Brent v. ErvinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1825
  4. Martin v. ReevesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1824

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API