Legal Opinion

Bryant v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 25, 1956No. 36364Published

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

1. “The offenses of making a forged instrument and uttering the same are separate and distinct, although knowledge that an instrument is forged is an essential ingredient of the crime of uttering.” Rowland v. State, 90 Ga. App. 742, 743 (84 S. E. 209).

2. The offense of altering a receipt for payment so as to make it purport to be a receipt for a larger amount than was in fact received and acknowledged is within the purview of Code § 26-3901 reading in part as follows: “Whoever, with intent to defraud . . . any person shall falsely and fraudulently . . . alter ... or cause or procure to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rome Railway & Light Co. v. BarnaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  2. Rowland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API