Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re the Arbitration between Central Mutual Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 14, 2008Published

1Dissent

Kavanagh, J. (dissenting).

I do not agree with the majority’s position that, prior to gaining access to supplementary uninsured/underinsured motorist (hereinafter SUM) coverage, an insured must fully exhaust the applicable policy limits of every tortfeasor’s insurance policy who was involved in the accident or, in the alternative, once it has fully exhausted the applicable policy limits of one tortfeasor, it must obtain written permission from the SUM carrier to enter into any settlement with any other tortfeasor that is less than the policy limits. For this reason, I respectfully dissent.

When…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. S'Dao v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. DohertyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Hertz Claim Management Corp. v. KulakowichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API