Adler-Goldman Commission Co. v. Bloom
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Independence Circuit Court. James W. Butler, Judge. The Adler-Goldman Commission Company, a corporation, brought suit in attachment in the Jackson circuit court against Morris, Charles, and Ben Bloom, partners by the style of Bloom Bros., and procured writs of garnishment to be issued, directed to Rufus C. Jones and David Bloom. Plaintiff filed interrogatories, and the garnishees answered, denying any indebtedness to defendants.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Independence Circuit Court. James W. Butler, Judge. The Adler-Goldman Commission Company, a corporation, brought suit in attachment in the Jackson circuit court against Morris, Charles, and Ben Bloom, partners by the style of Bloom Bros., and procured writs of garnishment to be issued, directed to Rufus C. Jones and David Bloom. Plaintiff filed interrogatories, and the garnishees answered, denying any indebtedness to defendants. Thereupon plaintiff brought suits against the garnishees, alleging that the garnishees had in their possession a stock of merchandise at Swifton worth…
1Opinion of the CourtBattle, J.
Two questions are presented for our ?onsideration.
First. Can a suit instituted by a plaintiff in an attachment proceeding against a person summoned as a g-arnishee in such proceeding, whose answer was unsatisfactory to the plaintiff, be legally prosecuted to judgment before the plaintiff recovers judgment in the action in which the order of attachment was sued out, and before the attachment in the same is sustained?
lshmeilt’
Second. Can the action instituted against the garnishee be consolidated with the action in which he was summoned?
First. An order of attachment, the execution of it, and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Giles v. HicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- Penyan v. BerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norman v. PooleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902