Legal Opinion

Van Etten v. Passumpsic Savings Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 12, 1907No. 14 934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: George A. Day, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Good, 0.

The appellant, David Van Etten, brought this, action to quiet title to a strip of ground 7 feet wide and 120 feet long, being a part of lot 9, Oapitol addition to the city of Omaha. The north end of this strip of ground fronts on the south side of Harney street, and the east line of the strip is 74 feet west of the west line of C. W. Keyes’ land. The plaintiff in his petition alleges that he is the owner and has been in continuous possession .of this strip of land since the 7th day of December, 1878, and avers that the defendant, the Passumpsic Savings Bank, claims to be the owner of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Etten v. TestNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kobarg v. GreederNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Gray v. GrayNebraska Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Van Etten v. TestNebraska Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Exchange Elevator Co. v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Enos v. HanffNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Olsen v. BestNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Pflasterer v. KoliopoulosNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Reetz v. OlsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API