Legal Opinion

Einard Nyyssonen v. Bendix Corporation

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided March 3, 1965No. 6189_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, Senior Circuit Judge

(by designation).

We are concerned on this appeal with two patents issued to the plaintiff-appellant on the same day, April 23, 1957. One, No. 2,790,098, is for a Polyphase Synchronous Machine; the other, No. 2,-790,131, is for a Polyphase Transformer System. 1 In issue are claims 1 and 10 of the 098 patent and claim 1 of the 131 patent. The court below found all three claims both invalid and not infringed, and entered a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint from which he has taken this appeal. 2

The patents are long. One consists of 11 pages of drawings (26 figures) and almost 50…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Admiral Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
Bresnick v. United States Vitamin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. American Gym, Recreational & Athletic Equipment Corporation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
In the Matter of Las Colinas, Inc., and Eastern Shore Development Corporation, Debtors, Appeal of Vigdor SchreibmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.