Legal Opinion

Pichenick v. City of New York

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 10, 1916Published

Action by Ruben Picheniclc against the City of New York. Judgment for plaintiff as prayed.

1Opinion of the CourtSnitkin, J.

The plaintiff brings this action against the defendant to recover the sum of $4.50 paid by him under the following circumstances :

Prior to July, 1915, an action was instituted in the Municipal Court of the City of New. York, Borough of Manhattan, Second District, by the plaintiff against Frederick W. Whitridge, as the receiver of *91the Dry Dock & East Broadway Railway Company. On the return day of the summons in that action, to wit, July 27, 1915, the plaintiff -demanded a trial by a jury pursuant to section 231 of the Municipal Court Act of New York City, and then and there tendered and paid…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gold v. M. Langfelder & Son, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API