Legal Opinion

People v. Koelzer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1963No. Crim. 3444PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

On this appeal by both defendants from judgments of second degree burglary after a jury trial and conviction, the sole contention is that defendants were convicted through the admission of evidence discovered and obtained by an illegal search of a motor vehicle.

Appeals were also taken from the orders (1) denying probation and (2) denying defendants’ motions for new trial. Said orders are nonappealable.

The search of defendant Harry Koelzer’s automobile occurred after and during a chain of events which included an arrest of both defendants. The arrests were under warrants but the warrants were…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. People v. HavenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. People v. WeitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. People v. KrapsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. People v. GravesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. KrapsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API