Legal Opinion
Cline v. Parker Industries
District Court, D. Utah
Decided August 25, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00635Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION RILEY A. CLINE and ZACHARY MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER AARON CLINE, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 26(g)(3) MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES Plaintiffs, (DOC. NO. 50) v. PARKER INDUSTRIES, INC. dba SOFA Case No. 2:21-cv-00635 SOURCE, Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg Defendant. Plaintiffs Riley Cline and Zachary Cline brought this action against their former employer, Parker Industries, Inc., asserting claims for discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.1 On August 29, 2022, the court granted the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Byrd, Inc., Debtor. Portales National Bank v. Armand SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- A PDX Pro Co. v. Dish Network Service, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2015