Legal Opinion

Smith v. Armstrong

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1946No. 8555Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

On motion for rehearing it is hereby ordered:(1) That the following be added to the decision heretofore promulgated in the above entitled action:

Further Opinion on Petition for Rehearing.

On motion for rehearing defendants contend that the court overlooked passing upon the objection that the lower court erred in denying the motion for non-suit in that there was a failure of proof because it is alleged that plaintiff owns the horses whereas the record discloses that plaintiff and Stanley Y. Kearl were partners and that the partnership owned the horses in question and…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GrimsleyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Thompson v. ShanleyMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Weiss v. HamiltonMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Schoenborn v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API