Legal Opinion

United States v. Baker

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided March 16, 2007No. 4:06CR00041 GTEPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EISELE, District Judge.

The Defendant, Mr. Antoine Baker, moves the Court pursuant to the All Writs Act and the Declaratory Judgment Statute to declare the Attorney General’s appointment of Mr. Tim Griffin to serve as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas “unconstitutional under U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2, cl. 2-3, or violating 28 U.S.C. § 541(a-b), or both.” 1 In addition, the Defendant contends the position of the United States Attorney “is a Presidential appointment not an Attorney General’s appointment.” 2

I. Background

The Defendant, Mr. Baker, is charged in this case with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. RoseDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
  2. United States v. TafoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
  3. Conner v. CostelloDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
  4. United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
  5. United States v. YoungDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API