United States v. Baker
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
EISELE, District Judge.
The Defendant, Mr. Antoine Baker, moves the Court pursuant to the All Writs Act and the Declaratory Judgment Statute to declare the Attorney General’s appointment of Mr. Tim Griffin to serve as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas “unconstitutional under U.S. Const., Art. II, § 2, cl. 2-3, or violating 28 U.S.C. § 541(a-b), or both.” 1 In addition, the Defendant contends the position of the United States Attorney “is a Presidential appointment not an Attorney General’s appointment.” 2
I. Background
The Defendant, Mr. Baker, is charged in this case with…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. RoseDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
- United States v. TafoyaDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
- Conner v. CostelloDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
- United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
- United States v. YoungDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2008