Pinnacle Bus Service, Inc. v. State
New York Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank P. Milano, J.
Defendant moves to dismiss the claim on the ground that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction.
In particular, defendant argues that adjudication of the claim would necessarily require review of an administrative determination of a state agency which is only permissible in a CPLR article 78 proceeding brought in Supreme Court. Claimant Pinnacle Bus Service, Inc. opposes the motion, asserting that the claim is based on the “negligent action and/or inaction by the Department of Motor Vehicles” and that no “administrative decision was ever issued in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lauer v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Scherbyn v. Wayne-Finger Lakes Board of Cooperative Educational ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Gross v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Psaty v. DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- City of New York v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.