Legal Opinion

Blair v. Brownstone Oil & Refining Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1911No. Civ. No. 1030PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The complaint alleged that on October 3, 1908, plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby the former, for a stipulated price per foot of depth, agreed to shut off the water, drill, construct and complete for defendant its oil well No. 5 from its then depth to a depth of 1,500 feet. By the express terms of this agreement defendant was to “furnish the derrick and all machinery, tools, cordage, lights, water, fuel, casing, casing-shoes, tubing and rods necessary for the deepening and drilling of the said well No. 5 from its present depth to a depth of 1,500 feet. ’ ’ It was further…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blair v. Brownstone Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. Blair v. Brownstone Oil & Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Whitty v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API