Legal Opinion

Ex Parte James

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1944No. 22894Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

GRAVES; Judge.

Relator contends that we should consider the statement of facts herein because this is a civil action and governed by the rules laid down relative to appeals in civil cases. With this contention we are not in accord. See Ex parte Adams, 13 S. W., (2d) 842; Ex parte Wair, 93 S. W. (2d) 160.

We find from the record that the sheriff is holding relator by virtue of a certain warrant of arrest and quarantine, alleging that she was a person afflicted with a contagious and communicable disease, said warrant being issued out of the office of city health officer of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte AdamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Ex Parte WairCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API