Legal Opinion

(PC) Newsome v. Loterzstain

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 18, 2023No. 2:19-cv-00307Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHELDON RAY NEWSOME, Case No. 2:19-cv-00307-DAD-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 LOTERZSTAIN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Sheldon Newsome, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleges that defendant Loterzstain violated his First and Eighth 19 Amendment rights by retaliating against him and denying him adequate medical care. Pending 20 before me is plaintiff’s motion for sanctions for spoliation wherein he claims that non-party 21 correctional…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. Glover v. Bic Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. In Re Napster, Inc. Copyright LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
  5. America Unites for Kids v. Sylvia RousseauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API