Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Purcell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 16, 2013No. ED 97630PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LISA S. VAN AMBURG, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
David S. Purcell and the law firm of Purcell & Amen LLC (collectively “Attorneys”), appeal from the judgment entered following a jury verdict in favor of the estates and trusts of Steve Boliance and Anna Holtz (“Estates”) on claims for legal malpractice. Attorneys contend the trial court erred in: submitting to the jury the issue of punitive damages, jury instructions regarding punitive damages, submitting Estates’ legal malpractice claims, excluding and admitting certain evidence, entering judgment against Attorneys for legal malpractice and denying…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Hoover's Dairy, Inc. v. Mid-America Dairymen, Inc./Special Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Howard v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Krause v. US Truck Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- Giddens v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bozelko v. PapastavrosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Koon v. WaldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- Aughenbaugh v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Travelers Commercial Casualty Company v. Vac-It-All Services, Inc., Respondent/Cross-Appellant.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hiscox Insurance Company Inc. v. Warden Grier, LLPDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.