Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. Brinkman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2019No. S-18-476PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreudenberg, J.

*383 NATURE OF CASE

The daughter of a testator sought a declaration of her rights under her father's will as an alleged devisee, claiming to be entitled to one-half of the residual share of her father's **317 testamentary estate under a residuary clause in the decedent's will. The estate asserted that the decedent unambiguously disinherited the daughter by excluding her name in the definition of " 'children' " or " 'issue,' " while expressly including the decedent's younger son's name and "all children of mine born or adopted after the execution hereof." After both parties moved for summary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holste v. Burlington Northern RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Youngson v. BondNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Schweitzer v. American National Red CrossNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Estate of SteppuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Ptak v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re Estate of AdelungNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  2. In re Estate of BrinkmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State ex rel. Stenehjem v. MarasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Bohling v. BohlingNebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Kimball v. Rosedale RanchNebraska Supreme Court · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API