Legal Opinion
In Re Tri-State Water Rights Litigation
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 17, 2009No. 2:07-cr-00001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAUL A. MAGNUSON, District Judge.
In the Rivers and Harbors Acts of 1945 and 1946 (“1945 RHA” and “1946 RHA”), Pub.L. No. 79-14, 59 Stat. 10, 10-11 (1945 RHA); Pub.L. No. 79-595, 60 Stat. 634, 640 (1946 RHA), Congress authorized the United States Army Corps of Engineers (the “Corps”) to begin construction of a dam and reservoir on the Chattahoochee River north of Atlanta, Georgia. Construction on the project finished in approximately 1960. The dam was christened the Buford Dam; the reservoir was named Lake Sidney Lanier.
At issue in this Multi-District Litigation (“MDL”) is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Mize v. Jefferson City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Securities Industry Ass'n v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re MDL-1824 Tri-State Water Rights LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Alabama v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- In Re: MDL-1824 Tri-State Water Rights LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011