Ragi v. Servis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
*1170We affirm. The four-month statute of limitations period to challenge the administrative determination here began to accrue on July 29, 2009, when petitioner was first informed that his request to rescind the modified consent order was denied (see CPLR 217 [1]; Matter of Adams v Carrion, 85 AD3d 1517, 1518 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 717 [2011]). The rejection of petitioner’s request on that date reflected a definitive position, it was final and binding, and no further administrative steps were available to petitioner (see Matter of Best Payphones, Inc. v Department of Info. Tech. & Telecom, of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Best Payphones, Inc. v. Department of Information Technology & TelecommunicationsNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Essex County v. ZagataNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Saraf v. VacantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Adams v. CarrionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Belmonte v. Saratoga Youth Hockey, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005