Legal Opinion
Sachs v. Astrue
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided July 29, 2008No. 06-CV-6460LPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, James M. Sachs, Jr., brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that he is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to Social Security disability benefits.
Plaintiff originally applied for Social Security disability benefits on June 25, 2004. (Tr. 13). 2 He alleged that he had been disabled since April 6, 2003, due to cervical and lumbar disc problems and ulcerative colitis. (Tr. 47).…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meyers v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
- Johnson v. SaulDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021