Sowerby v. Doyal
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
PHIPPS, Presiding Judge.
This case involves a legal malpractice action that Marsha Doyal brought against her former attorney, Vincent D. Sowerby, and his law firm, The Law Office of Vincent D. Sowerby, EC. Sowerby and the law firm moved to dismiss the action on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitation. Doyal responded that the limitation period had been tolled by fraud. The trial court denied the motion, and we granted interlocutory review. For the following reasons, the limitation period was not tolled, and the statute of limitation barred the action. Accordingly, we find…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jankowski v. Taylor, Bishop & LeeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Hunter, MacLean, Exley & Dunn, P.C. v. FrameSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Columbia County v. BrantonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Hoffman v. PMC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Talbot County Bd. of Com'rs v. WoodallSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Warehouseboy Trading, Inc. v. Gew Fitness, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- JUNIOR ROCHA-CRUZ v. DUCATI NORTH AMERICA, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2025
- Warehouseboy Trading, Inc. v. Gew Fitness, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012