Legal Opinion

Hollyrood Park Associates v. Dingman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: In this summary proceeding to recover possession of an apartment the tenants appeal only from that part of the judgment which awarded the landlord respondent its attorney’s fees. The proceedings were instituted when the tenants failed to pay rent for two months. Appellants’ sole contention is that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to grant attorney’s fees in a summary proceeding. Appellants argue that in the absence of a clear written designation in the lease that attorney’s fees shall be considered as part of the provision for rent,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Petrakakis v. Crown Hotels, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  2. Morningside Studios, Inc. v. Lucille Hotel Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ross Realty v. V & A Fabricators, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. The Marketplace v. SmithHenrietta Justice Court · 1999
  3. Marietta Associates v. CallierRochester City Court · 1994
  4. Travis v. 29-33 Convent Avenue HDFCNew York Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API