Legal Opinion

Elliott's Admr. v. Bush

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 1, 1881PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL FROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT. [Cited, German Bank v. Louisville, 108 Ky. 377, 2 Ky. L. 9, 56 S. W. 504; Norris v. Williams, 23 Ky. L. 1497, 65 S. W. 439; Vance v. Vance’s Admr., 116 Ky. 520, 25 Ky. L. 741, 76 S. W. 370.]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:

The appellees were not entitled to the rents collected by the administrator or that fell due prior to1 the confirmation of the sale. The administrator may have had no right to rent the real estate in that capacity, but his response to the rule states that he was also guardian for the infant in whom was vested the legal title. Suppose, however, he had no legal power to rent; still, if he did so and it was necessary that this part of the estate should be applied to the payment of debts, the appellant would be liable for the rent collected and could be required to pay it to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. German Bank v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  2. Norris v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Vance v. Vance's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. Grinstead's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. German Bank v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  3. Vance v. Vance's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API