Legal Opinion

Krummen v. McVey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 1946No. 4-7860Published

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

C. H. and Essie B. McYey are husband and wife, and occupied in that relation, a house in the city of 'Stuttgart, belonging to Ed Krummen, who brought unlawful detainer to recover possession of the house, and judgment for the rent past due and unpaid. ■Only McYey, the husband, was named as a defendant in the complaint. It was alleged that the honse had been rented to McVey at a monthly rental of $17.50, and had been occupied for thirteen months without payment of rent, and that $227.50 was due as such.

Statutory notice to vacate was given, and when it was not complied with, this suit was filed,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burgess v. PooleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  2. Declerk v. SpikesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Layton v. LintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  4. Thompson v. KirkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API