Goodman v. Wachovia Bank, National Ass'n
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice LANG-MIERS.
This is a restricted appeal. Wa-chovia Bank, N.A. sued James E. Goodman on a promissory note. Goodman did not file an answer, and the trial court rendered a no-answer default judgment in favor of Wachovia for the principal amount of the note, plus interest, late charges, and attorney’s fees. Goodman filed this restricted appeal, arguing that the judgment must be reversed because the face of the record does not show strict compliance with civil procedure rule 107 regarding return of service. 1 We affirm.
A. Requirements for a restricted appeal
A restricted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
- General Electric Co. v. Falcon Ridge Apartments, Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Hubicki v. FestinaTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Burke v. Insurance Auto Auctions Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2005
- Dolly v. Aethos Communications Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Myan Management Group, L.L.C. v. Adam Sparks Family Revocable Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Ameriquest Mortgage Company F/K/A Long Beach Mortgage v. Clyde Ashworth and Paula Welch, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- Double S Services, LLC v. Pel-State Bulk Plant, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
- Emmanuel Funeral Home and Ray Charles Emanuel v. Phipps Memorial Company, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2024