Legal Opinion

State v. Moran

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1906PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Monona District Court.— Hon. Wm. Hutchinson, Judge. Ti-ie defendant having been convicted of larceny, appeals.- —

1Opinion of the Court

Weaver, J.—

1. Indictment: limitation: evidence in removal of bar. Defendant was charged with the laceny of certain horses alleged to have been conmmitted on May 16, 1901. As the indictment was not found within three years after the date named it became essential to the State’s case to show that the operation of the statute of limitations had been suspended by the defendant’s absence from the State during that period. To that end a witness was produced, who testified that he was, and for some time had *647been, warden of the State penitentiary at Stillwater, Minn.; that he had known defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HeightSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. State v. HelmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  3. Lowe v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. State v. BoothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  5. State v. PostlewaitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1863

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CaseyOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Anderson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State v. HarmonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  4. State v. ClaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. State v. LeitzkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API