Legal Opinion

Curran v. Bartow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1910No. Docket No. 126PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Catherine Curran presented for probate the last will and testament of George Horn, deceased. The will was allowed in the probate court, and Frederick Bartow, contestant, appealed to the circuit court. A judgment for proponent on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by contestant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

Contestant appealed to the circuit court of Wayne county from the order admitting to probate the last will and testament of deceased. A trial was had in the circuit court, which resulted in a verdict directed for proponent. From a judgment entered upon such verdict, contestant has removed the case to this court by writ of error for review.

The sole question presented in the case is whether there was a due and valid execution of the will presented for *21probate. The testator died October 12, 1906. The will was executed April 4, 1904. The testator and the two witnesses to the will lived in the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. . JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Sisters of Charity of St. Vincent De Paul v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Reed v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  4. O'Brien v. GalagherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
  5. Duffie v. CorridonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re Dougherty's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Will of Griffith v. GriffithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Estate of BrashearArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Gordon v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In Re Kahl's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API