Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Waldo

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 13, 1923No. 10938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This was an action by N. B. Waldo, one of the defendants in error, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, plaintiff in error, and St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company, one of the defendants in error, to recover the sum of $20, as penalty for delay in transporting a carload of hay, and the sum of $33, demurrage on _said car, which it is claimed was wrongfully collected of the plaintiff by the defendant St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company. A trial to a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stoddard Lumber Co. v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Luella Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Dreyfuss-Weil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Chowning v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Leger Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Winters Bros.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API