Legal Opinion
In Re Limbaugh
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 3, 1996No. 19-30612PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLY S. HIGDON, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the court for confirmation of the debtors’ Chapter 13 plan. In their plan the debtors have divided the claims of unsecured creditors into two classes: (1) the claims of general unsecured creditors and (2) the unsecured restitution claim of Multnomah County. The debtors propose to make no distribution to general unsecured creditors but propose to pay Mult-nomah County’s restitution claim in full.
No creditor or party-in-interest filed an objection to confirmation of the debtors’ proposed plan based upon the proposed discriminatory…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In the Matter of John Joseph METZ, Debtor. DOWNEY SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. John Joseph METZ, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Amfac Distribution Corp. v. Wolff (In Re Wolff)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re: Wayne K. Crawford, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- In Re AliceaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- In Re JamesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2001
- In Re GamesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 1997
- In Re BennettUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.