Legal Opinion

Santa Barbara Lodge No. 605 v. Penzner

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 29, 1951No. Civ. No. 18261PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

This action was commenced in Santa Barbara County for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property in that county, or for damages in the event defendant should be unable to fulfill the terms of the contract.

Defendant’s motion for change of venue to Los Angeles County on the ground that he is a resident of the latter county was granted and plaintiff has appealed from the order.

The county in which the real property is situated is the county in which the case should be tried. (Code Civ. Proc., § 392; Kopke v. Carlson, 98 Cal.App. 155, 157 [276 P. 606]; McFarland v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McFarland v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Kopke v. CarlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Santa Barbara Lodge No. 605 v. PenznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API