Legal Opinion

In re Rosenthal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner charges that respondent, while serving as counsel to the public administrator of Kings County, engaged in professional misconduct.

Having issued an order declaring that no factual issues are raised by the pleadings with respect to respondent and having heard respondent in mitigation {see 22 NYCRR 806.5), we now find him guilty of the following professional misconduct.

In his capacity as counsel to the public administrator of Kings County, respondent charged and collected excessive fees, in contravention of SCPA 1108 (2) (c) and in violation of the Appellate Division disciplinary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of FeinbergNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. In re FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re AdelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re AlayonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Matter of ZankowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. In re FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. In re RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API