United States v. Guadalupe Rodriguez-Gastelum
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WRIGHT, Circuit Judge,
with whom TRASK, CHOY, WALLACE, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, concur:
We took this case en banc to consider whether a suspect in a criminal investigation can waive his right to counsel after having initially made known his desire to have the assistance of counsel. We hold that a per se rule prohibiting such a waiver is neither necessary nor appropriate.
Rodriguez-Gastelum made incriminating statements after he was stopped while driving an automobile loaded with marijuana.1 He was proceeding toward Tucson in a vehicle which had been under customs surveillance in a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Eneas Lavern NickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Dennis Rosa Collazo v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Mens ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.