Legal Opinion

United States v. Guadalupe Rodriguez-Gastelum

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1978No. 76-2241PublishedCited by 113 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Circuit Judge,

with whom TRASK, CHOY, WALLACE, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges, concur:

We took this case en banc to consider whether a suspect in a criminal investigation can waive his right to counsel after having initially made known his desire to have the assistance of counsel. We hold that a per se rule prohibiting such a waiver is neither necessary nor appropriate.

Rodriguez-Gastelum made incriminating statements after he was stopped while driving an automobile loaded with marijuana.1 He was proceeding toward Tucson in a vehicle which had been under customs surveillance in a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by113 opinions

  1. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. Eneas Lavern NickCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. Dennis Rosa Collazo v. Wayne Estelle, Warden, California Mens ColonyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API