Legal Opinion

Roake v. Sullivan

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1910PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action foi damages arising out of a failure of title to real estate.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

On .September 22, 1&98-, the defendant Hugh Sullivan conveyed the premises -described in the complaint by full covenant and warranty deed to the plaintiffs and James Charder, and the latter, on April 2, 1904, likewise by full covenant and warranty deed, conveyed Ms interest to the plaintiffs who -are now the owners and in possession of the premises.

A purchase-money mortgage was executed to Hugh Sullivan, the grantor, for part of the consideration price for Ms *430conveyance, which is now being foreclosed, these plaintiffs being defendants in the action and setting up, as I am informed, a breach…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Staats v. Executors of Ten EyckNew York Supreme Court · 1805
  2. Brandt v. FosterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  3. Mills v. CatlinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849
  4. Lockwood v. SturdevantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1827
  5. Dimmick v. LockwoodNew York Supreme Court · 1833

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. DahlbergIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Webster v. RagonaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API