D, Otherwise C. v. C

91 N.J. Super. 562 (1966)

221 A.2d 763

D, OTHERWISE C, PLAINTIFF,

v.

C, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided June 29, 1966.

Mr. Morris M. Schnitzer for plaintiff (Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer & Kasen, attorneys).

Mr. Arnold K. Mytelka for defendant (Messrs. Clapp & Eisenberg, attorneys).

McALEVY, J.S.C.

The question presented here is whether the plaintiff, an impotent wife, may successfully maintain an annulment action based on her impotence. This is a matter of novel impression in New Jersey.

The defendant, through his attorney, submitted generally to the jurisdiction of this…