United States v. Ray
Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
1DissentCooper, Judge
To the extent that the majority opinion states that multiplicity is not an issue in this ease, I can agree. However, I respectfully dissent from the remaining positions taken and result reached by the majority. This case involves the application of the principle of preventing an unreasonable multiplication of charges and thus ensuring a fair result for an accused and does not involve the issue of multiplicity.
I agree with Judge Rolph that multiplicity is a legal concept that applies only to the issue of whether multiple convictions and punishment may be imposed under different statutes for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. TetersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
- United States v. FosterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. BrittonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.