Boeing Co. v. Fine
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
The respondent, Dorothy Fine, was granted compensation under the Industrial Insurance Act for a low back injury she sustained in the course of her employment as a clerk-typist for the Boeing Company, appellant herein. The record shows that the claimant, Dorothy Fine, was in the process of bending over and reaching for a file box when her telephone rang. She performed or went through a twisting movement to reach the telephone, while leaning in the opposite direction. As she did so, she experienced an immediate sharp pain in the small of her back. The low back injury resulting from her twisting…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Windust v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Dayton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Woods v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Lawson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Porter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1958
3Cited by9 opinions
- American International Vacations v. MacBrideNevada Supreme Court · 1983
- Reynolds v. Continental Can CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Spino v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
- Vaupell Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
- Longview Fibre Co. v. WeimerWashington Supreme Court · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.