Legal Opinion

The Mississippi Bar v. Mary Lee Holmes

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2021No. 2020-BD-01183-SCTPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-BD-01183-SCT THE MISSISSIPPI BAR v. MARY LEE HOLMES ATTORNEY FOR COMPLAINANT: MELISSA SELMAN SCOTT ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT: MARY LEE HOLMES (PRO SE) NATURE OF THE CASE: CIVIL - BAR MATTERS DISPOSITION: PUBLIC REPRIMAND AND ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AND EXPENSES - 04/01/2021 MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED: MANDATE ISSUED: EN BANC. BEAM, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. The Mississippi Bar filed a formal complaint against Mary Lee Holmes, seeking reciprocal discipline under Rule 13 of the Rules of Discipline for the Mississippi State Bar after the Louisiana Supreme…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mississippi Bar v. DrungoleMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Mississippi Bar v. StraussMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  3. The Mississippi Bar v. HodgesMississippi Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mississippi Bar v. IsheeMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Mississippi Bar v. InserraMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API