Legal Opinion

Miller v. Clayton County

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 3, 1999No. S99A0297, S99A0298PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hunstein, Justice.

Appellants Miller, Frame and Baker appeal from the trial court’s order denying relief under their mandamus petition seeking to require Clayton County and its commissioners to include in appellants’ retirement benefits those sums earned by appellants in addition to the compensation appellants receive pursuant to Ga. L. 1959, p. 375, as amended. Because we find no error in the trial court’s determination that for the purpose of these additional sums appellants are not employees under the County’s pension ordinance, we affirm.

The evidence adduced before the trial court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norris v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Quillian v. Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989
  3. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
  4. Williams v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Teachers' Retirement System v. ForehandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dukes v. Board of Trustees for the Police Officers Pension FundSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  2. Boatright v. Old Dominion Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Mullis v. Bibb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Maree v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Employees' Retirement System of Georgia v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API