Whirlpool Corporation v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge Reyna.
Prost, Chief Judge.
Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee ("AEFTC") appeals a decision from the U.S. Court of International Trade ("the CIT") affirming a scope ruling of the U.S. Department of Commerce. The scope ruling held that Whirlpool Corporation's kitchen appliance door handles with end caps ("assembled handles") do not fall within the scope of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China ("the Orders"). For the reasons stated below, we…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eckstrom Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Smith Corona Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- King Supply Co., LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Meridian Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Shenyang Yuanda Aluminum Industry Engineering Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Perfectus Aluminum, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- China Custom Manufacturing Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2023
- Meridian Prods. LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
- Mitsubishi Polyester Film, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
- Aluminum Extrusions Fair Trade Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.