Legal Opinion

Frishman v. Stonebraker

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 9, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 2142-66PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*975MEMORANDUM

GESELL, District Judge.

This is an action for balance due on a promissory note and for a declaratory judgment. The parties have stipulated the facts and various agreements and correspondence between them were received by consent.

The note was executed on June 26, 1963, for the principal sum of $39,642.20, with interest at six percent. The pertinent provisions of the note read as follows:

“Said principal and interest payable in monthly installments of FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY Dollars ($550.00), with the privilege of making larger payments in any amount, commencing July 1st, 1963, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davy v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Order of Ahepa v. Travel Consultants, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Bernard Lyon Frishman v. Mildred M. StonebrakerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API