Legal Opinion

Manchester v. Annis (In Re Annis)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 17, 1999No. BAP No. WO-98-075, Bankruptcy No. 98-11454, Adversary No. 98-1201PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATHESON, Chief Judge.

This panel has before it for review the order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Oklahoma determining that certain tax refunds due the debt- or could be claimed as exempt earnings pursuant to Okla. Stat. tit. 31, § 1.1. For the reasons set forth below we conclude the decision of the Bankruptcy Court must be reversed.

JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW

A Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, with the consent of the parties, has jurisdiction to hear appeals from final judgments, orders and decrees of bankruptcy judges within this circuit. 28…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. In the Matter of Henry A. Kokoszka, BankruptsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. In Re Ryd WALLERSTEDT and Colleen Wallerstedt, Debtors. Ryd WALLERSTEDT and Colleen Wallerstedt, Appellees, v. David A. SOSNE, Trustee, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Van Lieshout v. Verill (In Re Verill)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Manchester v. AnnisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  2. Manchester v. AnnisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API