Pippinger v. Pippinger

The parties are referred to as they appeared in the trial court: plaintiff in error as defendant and defendant in error as plaintiff.

Defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in its orders awarding a division of property to plaintiff and support payments for the minor child by which he claims to have been pauperized. By writ of error the defendant seeks to reverse the judgment.

Plaintiff and defendant were married October 16, 1939; they were divorced October 30, 1958. Since 1942 the defendant has been a railroad company employee in Denver. His present annual gross income is…