Legal Opinion

Franek v. Vaughan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 19, 1900No. Nos. 12,325—(89)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of tbe district court for Scott county, affirming a judgment of a justice of tbe peace in favor of plaintiff, entered pursuant to tbe order of Cadwell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Tbis action originated in justice court. Tbe parties appeared, and, after tbe pleadings were closed, tbe defendant duly made application to tbe justice by filing with him a written request to that effect, to adjourn tbe case for one week, and left tbe court. Tbe justice denied tbe application, and proceeded to bear tbe case on tbe part of tbe plaintiff, and rendered judgment in bis favor, and against tbe defendant, for $78 damages and costs. Tbe defendant appealed to tbe district court on questions of law alone, and that court affirmed tbe judgment of tbe justice on tbe ground that tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. StaleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
  2. Shartle v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  3. Payson v. EverettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
  4. Craighead v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  5. Palmer v. St. Paul & Duluth RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Quaker Creamery Co. v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Johnson v. LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Kennedy v. KellumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API